Apricity positions itself as a champion of expression and voice, extending an open call to writers working in poetry, drama, fiction, and non-fiction. The magazine maintains a dual-track submission model: online publication accommodates work without word limits, while print consideration requires prose to remain under 7,500 words and poetry under 3,000 words. This structure allows for both expansive digital publishing and a disciplined print curation, suggesting an editorial eye attuned to the formal demands of each medium. The journal explicitly welcomes almost all subject matter, with the sole exception of erotica, and permits editorials while excluding research papers and any work created using AI. Such parameters indicate a commitment to human-generated, expressive writing that prioritizes voice over academic or algorithmic production. The organizational context is significant: Apricity is staffed entirely by university students and operates on an academic calendar, suspending operations from the end of May through the end of August. This rhythm shapes the submission experience—pieces sent in April and May may not receive a response until August, and all submitters are advised to expect notification within three months. For writers, this transparency about seasonal delays is a mark of respect for their time, even as it reflects the realities of a volunteer, student-run enterprise. The absence of a submission fee further lowers barriers, aligning with the magazine's stated mission to champion expression without economic gatekeeping. What artists receive is publication—online or in print—within a platform that values voice and breadth of subject matter. There is no prize, no monetary award, and no physical location attached to the opportunity; the reward is visibility and editorial selection by a student cohort navigating the literary landscape. The curatorial vision appears to favor work that is expressive, unbound by strict thematic constraints, and free from AI generation. Writers should note the explicit exclusion of erotica and research papers, which suggests a preference for imaginative, personal, or critical writing that stops short of the explicitly sexual or the purely academic. The dual online/print structure implies that online publication may be more accessible, while print selection is reserved for work that meets stricter length requirements and presumably a higher bar of editorial fit.